Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit /

1909

181 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit opinions from 1909.

  • The W. A. Sherman Feb 16, 1909 No. 204 167 F. 976; 93 C.C.A. 228; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4410
  • Tiffany v. Drummond Feb 16, 1909 No. 179 168 F. 47; 93 C.C.A. 469; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4425
  • United States v. Auto Import Co. Feb 16, 1909 Nos. 198, 199 (4,915, 4,918) 168 F. 242; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4445
  • United States v. Merck Feb 16, 1909 No. 129 (3,922) 168 F. 244; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4446
  • United States v. Moore Feb 16, 1909 No. 33 168 F. 36; 24 L.R.A.N.S. 309; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4419; 24 L.R.A (N.S.) 309
  • United States v. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. Feb 16, 1909 No. 136 (4,957) 167 F. 533; 93 C.C.A. 65; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4369
  • Walter Baker & Co. v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Feb 16, 1909 168 F. 248; 93 C.C.A. 550; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4448
  • Morse v. United States Feb 12, 1909 168 F. 49; 93 C.C.A. 471; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4427
  • The Margaretha Jan 13, 1909 No. 81 167 F. 794; 93 C.C.A. 184; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4384
  • A. Klipstein & Co. v. United States Jan 12, 1909 No. 127 (5,205) 167 F. 535; 93 C.C.A. 67; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4370
  • B. F. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United States Jan 12, 1909 No. 133 (4,992) 167 F. 798; 93 C.C.A. 188; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4386
  • Bull v. New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. Jan 12, 1909 Nos. 40, 41 167 F. 792; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4383
  • Cole v. Cordley Jan 12, 1909 No. 121 167 F. 542; 93 C.C.A. 220; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4373
  • De Lamar v. Herdeley Jan 12, 1909 No. 122 167 F. 530; 93 C.C.A. 239; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4367
  • E. J. Manville Mach. Co. v. Excelsior Needle Co. Jan 12, 1909 No. 137 167 F. 538; 93 C.C.A. 216; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4372
  • Eckstein v. United States Jan 12, 1909 No. 106 (4,335) 167 F. 802; 93 C.C.A. 192; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4389
  • Fiegel v. United States Jan 12, 1909 No. 104 (4,659) 167 F. 537; 93 C.C.A. 215; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4371
  • Hamilton v. United States Jan 12, 1909 No. 126 (5,108) 167 F. 796; 93 C.C.A. 186; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4385
  • Horrax v. United States Jan 12, 1909 No. 118 (4,787) 167 F. 526; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4365
  • In re Empire Construction & Supply Co. Jan 12, 1909 No. 115 166 F. 1019; 92 C.C.A. 666; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4314
  • In re Goldberg Jan 12, 1909 No. 123 167 F. 808; 93 C.C.A. 203; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4392
  • Jackson & S. Traction Co. v. Green Jan 12, 1909 No. 128 167 F. 806; 93 C.C.A. 272; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4391
  • Schmid v. Dohan Jan 12, 1909 No. 113 167 F. 804; 93 C.C.A. 194; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4390
  • United States v. Behrend Jan 12, 1909 Nos. 90, 91 (14,304, 4,585) 167 F. 317; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4344
  • United States v. Cattus Jan 12, 1909 No. 135 (5,014) 167 F. 532; 93 C.C.A. 64; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4368
  • United States v. Grace Jan 12, 1909 No. 112 (4,829) 166 F. 748; 92 C.C.A. 596; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4304
  • United States v. Reiss Jan 12, 1909 No. 131 (4,753) 166 F. 746; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4303
  • United States v. Rusch & Co. Jan 12, 1909 Nos. 92, 99, 100 (4,736, 5,090, 5,091) 167 F. 523; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4364
  • Von Bremen v. United States Jan 12, 1909 Nos. 124, 125 (4,763, 4,764) 168 F. 889; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4516
  • Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Condit Electrical Mfg. Co. Jan 12, 1909 No. 120 167 F. 546; 93 C.C.A. 224; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4374
  • Zinkeisen & Co. v. United States Jan 12, 1909 No. 119 (4,920) 167 F. 312; 92 C.C.A. 624; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4342
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑