U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1913

Edenborn v. Sim

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided April 8, 1913 · Coxe, Noyes, Uacombe

204 F. 781; 123 C.C.A. 144; 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1353

Counsel

Arleigh Pelham, of New York City, for plaintiff in error., T. B. Strong, for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Evans v. District Court (Idaho 1930)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER. CURIAM.

This voluminous record has already been printed, and it may require very careful scrutiny to determine just what parts of it are not properly before us. For this reason it seems wiser to deny the present motion to strike out parts of it. The questions presented may be disposed of on the main argument.

In making this disposition of the motion, we are not to be understood as intimating any departure from the well-settled practice, announced in decisions of the Supreme Court and of this court, as to what questions are open to review on writ of error from a judgment entered after a hearing before a referee.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.