U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1913

G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Pub. Co.

G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Pub. Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided June 18, 1913
207 F. 515; 125 C.C.A. 177; 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1642

Counsel

W. D. Guthrie, of New York City (W. B. Hale, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant., H. A. Bayne and Strong & Cadwalader, all of New York City (Lauren Carroll and Harry D. Nims, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Pub. Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Taken as a whole, we fully approve Judge Hand’s opinion and upon it affirm the decree appealed from. In so doing, however, we must not be regarded as assenting to the proposition that the name “Webster’s Dictionary” has a technical or secondary meaning as indicating a publication of the complainant. And, on the other hand, we must not be considered as indicating an opinion that cases cannot be presented showing unfair competition in the sale of-books or as passing upon the relief which may be granted in cases of fraud.

The decree of the District Court is affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.