The M. E. Luckenbach
The M. E. Luckenbach
214 F. 571; 131 C.C.A. 177; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1161
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Porello v. United States (2d Cir. 1946)
- The Panther (2d Cir. 1925)
- The Silvia (District Court, E.D. New York 1924)
- Acktieselskabet Bolgen v. McWilliams Bros. (2d Cir. 1924)
- The Sunnyside (2d Cir. 1918)
- Exner Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp. (District Court, E.D. New York 1957)
- Eriksen v. Pacific American Fisheries (9th Cir. 1936)
- In re Pennsylvania R. Co. (2d Cir. 1931)
- Wathen v. WestmoreLand Coal Co. (4th Cir. 1930)
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. City of New York (2d Cir. 1929)
- Cleary Bros. v. Port Reading R. Co. (2d Cir. 1928)
- The Townsend (2d Cir. 1928)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We have no doubt that the place of stranding is-where the government witnesses locate it. That being so, it seems very plain that the stranding was due to the b.arge’s failure to anchor in time and with sufficient chain. Judge Veeder has very fully and carefully discussed the testimony. We concur with his reasoning and conclusion.
The decree is affirmed, with costs, on his opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.