Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit /

1916

234 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit opinions from 1916.

  • Freeman v. United States Oct 6, 1916 No. 23 237 F. 815; 151 C.C.A. 57; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2003
  • Frankfurt-Barnett Co. v. William Prym Co. Jul 17, 1916 No. 287 237 F. 21; 150 C.C.A. 223; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1925
  • Davis v. Finch Jul 7, 1916 No. 296 236 F. 89; 149 C.C.A. 299; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2251
  • Staats v. Biograph Co. Jul 3, 1916 No. 281 236 F. 454; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2289
  • Tompkins v. St. Regis Paper Co. Jul 1, 1916 No. 279 236 F. 221; 149 C.C.A. 411; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2273
  • Babbitt v. Read Jun 29, 1916 No. 236 236 F. 42; 149 C.C.A. 252; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2243
  • Salas v. United States Jun 24, 1916 No. 170 234 F. 842; 148 C.C.A. 440; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2138
  • Gleason v. Thaw Jun 23, 1916 No. 301 234 F. 570; 148 C.C.A. 336; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2113
  • Oriental Tissue Co. v. Louis De Jonge & Co. Jun 19, 1916 No. 288 234 F. 895; 148 C.C.A. 493; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2153
  • United States v. One Case, No. 1,577 Jun 19, 1916 No. 295 234 F. 856; 148 C.C.A. 454; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2141
  • Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co. Jun 15, 1916 No. 248 235 F. 398; 148 C.C.A. 660; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2197
  • Ransom & Randolph Co. v. Pinches Jun 15, 1916 No. 284 234 F. 847; 148 C.C.A. 445; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2139
  • Hanson v. Hanson Jun 14, 1916 No. 282 234 F. 853; 148 C.C.A. 451; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2140
  • Alco Film Corp. v. Alco Film Service of Minnesota Jun 10, 1916 Nos. 149, 237 234 F. 55; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2060
  • Hammond v. Manhattan Electrical Supply Co. Jun 9, 1916 No. 294 234 F. 337; 148 C.C.A. 239; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2101
  • Levis v. American Trading Co. Jun 9, 1916 No. 269 234 F. 863; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2144; 148 C.C.A. 461
  • Nellie T. Jun 9, 1916 No. 245 235 F. 117; 148 C.C.A. 611; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2181
  • General Electric Co. v. Laco-Philips Co. Jun 7, 1916 233 F. 96; 147 C.C.A. 166; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2439
  • Thacher v. Transit Const. Co. Jun 7, 1916 No. 290 234 F. 640; 148 C.C.A. 406; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2132
  • American Graphophone Co. v. American Parlograph Corp. Jun 6, 1916 No. 134 235 F. 137; 148 C.C.A. 631; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2188
  • Hopkins v. United States Jun 6, 1916 No. 303 234 F. 867; 148 C.C.A. 465; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2147
  • In re Lesser Jun 6, 1916 No. 283 234 F. 65; 148 C.C.A. 81; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2064
  • Pocahontas Jun 6, 1916 Nos. 298, 299 235 F. 116; 148 C.C.A. 610; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2180
  • Themistocles Jun 6, 1916 No. 276 235 F. 81; 148 C.C.A. 575; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2169
  • Willard Jun 6, 1916 No. 300 235 F. 112; 148 C.C.A. 606; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2178
  • Erber v. United States Jun 2, 1916 No. 262 234 F. 221; 148 C.C.A. 123; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2076
  • Cook v. Flagg May 24, 1916 No. 297 233 F. 426; 147 C.C.A. 362; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2484
  • De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. United States Tire Co. May 24, 1916 No. 273 235 F. 290; 149 C.C.A. 6; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2194
  • Decker v. Smith May 24, 1916 No. 272 234 F. 646; 148 C.C.A. 412; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2133
  • In re Soloway & Katz May 24, 1916 No. 96 234 F. 67; 148 C.C.A. 83; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2065
  • Ng Jung v. United States May 24, 1916 No. 289 233 F. 992; 147 C.C.A. 666; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2545
  • Palmer v. Joseph May 24, 1916 No. 271 233 F. 1003; 148 C.C.A. 13; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2548
  • Rubes v. E. J. Willis Co. May 24, 1916 No. 278 234 F. 341; 148 C.C.A. 243; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2103
  • The Edward G. Murray May 24, 1916 No. 260 234 F. 61; 148 C.C.A. 77; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2062
  • Thermogene Co. v. Thermozine Co. May 24, 1916 No. 275 234 F. 69; 148 C.C.A. 85; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2066
  • Robinson v. Roe May 23, 1916 No. 257 233 F. 936; 147 C.C.A. 610; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2530
  • Burke Electric Co. v. Independent Pneumatic Tool Co. May 16, 1916 No. 117 234 F. 93; 148 C.C.A. 109; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2073
  • Munson S. S. Line v. Glasgow Nav. Co. May 15, 1916 No. 4 235 F. 64; 148 C.C.A. 558; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2165
  • Autopiano Co. v. Claviola Co. May 9, 1916 No. 246 234 F. 314; 148 C.C.A. 216; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2096
  • Bush & Lane Piano Co. v. Becker Bros. May 9, 1916 No. 265 234 F. 79; 148 C.C.A. 95; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2068
  • Fisher Hydraulic Stone & Machinery Co. v. Warner May 9, 1916 No. 249 233 F. 527; 147 C.C.A. 413; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2496
  • Flagg v. United States May 9, 1916 No. 196 233 F. 481; 147 C.C.A. 367; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2486
  • Gibson v. American Graphophone Co. May 9, 1916 No. 29 234 F. 633; 148 C.C.A. 399; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2129
  • In re Barker Piano Co. May 9, 1916 No. 258 233 F. 522; 147 C.C.A. 408; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2494
  • In re Pierson May 9, 1916 Nos. 107-109, 114 233 F. 519; 147 C.C.A. 405; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493
  • In re Wray May 9, 1916 No. 250 233 F. 418; 147 C.C.A. 354; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2480
  • Johnson v. Lambert May 9, 1916 No. 266 234 F. 886; 148 C.C.A. 484; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2151
  • Keys v. Meyer May 9, 1916 No. 264 234 F. 94; 148 C.C.A. 110; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2074
  • Lehigh Valley R. v. Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal May 9, 1916 No. 259 234 F. 310; 148 C.C.A. 212; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2094
  • Napier v. Westerhoff May 9, 1916 No. 219 233 F. 398; 147 C.C.A. 334; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑