Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit /

1919

164 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit opinions from 1919.

  • Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. Public Service Cup Corp. Dec 31, 1919 No. 148 263 F. 98; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2154
  • McCole v. Chelsea Lighterage Co. Dec 31, 1919 No. 133 262 F. 1018; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2000
  • General Fireproofing Co. v. Terami Dec 19, 1919 No. 73 262 F. 106; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1907
  • Horowitz v. United States Dec 19, 1919 No. 23 262 F. 48; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1899
  • Simons v. Cromwell Dec 19, 1919 No. 57 262 F. 680; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1963
  • Kambeitz v. United States Dec 17, 1919 No. 47 262 F. 378; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1941
  • A. Kimball Co. v. Noesting Pin Ticket Co. Dec 16, 1919 No. 74 262 F. 148; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1921
  • Sweet v. All Package Grocery Stores Co. Dec 12, 1919 No. 63 262 F. 727; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1965
  • Venner v. Graves Dec 11, 1919 No. 124 255 F. 686; 167 C.C.A. 62; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1509
  • Baltzley v. Spengler Loomis Mfg. Co. Dec 10, 1919 No. 66 262 F. 423; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1949
  • De Croisset v. Vitagraph Co. of America Dec 10, 1919 No. 79 262 F. 100; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1906
  • Dorrance v. Barber & Co. Dec 10, 1919 No. 65 262 F. 489; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1955
  • Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. Co. v. Petkunas Dec 10, 1919 No. 55 261 F. 988; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1878
  • Gill v. United States Dec 10, 1919 No. 43 262 F. 502; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1959
  • H. D. Smith & Co. v. Peck Dec 10, 1919 No. 81 262 F. 415; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1947
  • Hammerschlag Mfg. Co. v. Importers' & Traders' Nat. Bank Dec 10, 1919 No. 46 262 F. 266; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1926
  • Homer Brooke Grass Co. v. Hartford-Fairmont Co. Dec 10, 1919 No. 67 262 F. 427; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1950
  • Howell v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. Dec 10, 1919 No. 48 262 F. 119; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1912
  • Imperial Machine & Foundry Corp. v. Blakeslee Dec 10, 1919 No. 119 262 F. 419; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1948
  • In re Dressler Producing Corp. Dec 10, 1919 No. 61 262 F. 257; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1924
  • In re Gottlieb Dec 10, 1919 No. 69 262 F. 730; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1966
  • In re H. L. Herbert & Co. Dec 10, 1919 No. 54 262 F. 682; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1964
  • In re Hughes Dec 10, 1919 No. 59 262 F. 500; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1958
  • In re Oliner Dec 10, 1919 No. 49 262 F. 734; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1967
  • Martin v. Imbrie Dec 10, 1919 No. 39 262 F. 44; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1898
  • Sullivan v. Nitrate Producers' S. S. Co. Dec 10, 1919 No. 42 262 F. 371; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1939
  • The Forde Dec 10, 1919 No. 64 262 F. 127; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1915
  • The Maryanne Dec 10, 1919 No. 15 262 F. 129; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1916
  • United States v. One Ford Automobile & Fourteen Packages of Distilled Spirits Dec 10, 1919 No. 102 262 F. 374; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1940
  • United States v. Union Bank of Canada Dec 10, 1919 Nos. 60, 28 262 F. 91; 8 A.L.R. 1438; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1903
  • United States v. Vogel Dec 10, 1919 No. 29 262 F. 262; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1925
  • Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. Public Service Cup Co. Dec 8, 1919 No. 147 262 F. 410; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1946
  • American Mercantile Corp. v. Spielberg Dec 2, 1919 No. 11 262 F. 492; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1956
  • Singleton v. Moore Dec 1, 1919 No. 103 262 F. 357; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1935
  • Rowe v. Drohen Nov 26, 1919 No. 5 262 F. 15; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1895
  • Evans v. United States Nov 24, 1919 No. 22 261 F. 902; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1863
  • The Bern Nov 21, 1919 No. 40 261 F. 995; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1881
  • Borman v. United States Nov 20, 1919 No. 35 262 F. 26; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1896
  • Burgess Battery Co. v. Novo Mfg. Co. Nov 20, 1919 No. 31 262 F. 972; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1986
  • Firpo v. United States Nov 18, 1919 No. 17 261 F. 850; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1851
  • United States Light & Heat Corp. v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. Nov 18, 1919 No. 27 261 F. 915; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1869
  • In re Perpall Nov 17, 1919 No. 37 261 F. 858; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1853
  • The Van Der Duyn Nov 13, 1919 No. 32 261 F. 887; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1858
  • Warner v. Gaston, Williams & Wigmore of Canada, Ltd. Nov 13, 1919 No. 8 261 F. 993; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1880
  • Batson v. Rosofa Nov 12, 1919 No. 25 261 F. 874; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1856
  • Descalzi v. Van Dyke J. Lindsay, Inc. Nov 12, 1919 No. 36 261 F. 891; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1859
  • Hanrahan v. Pacific Transport Co. Nov 12, 1919 No. 44 262 F. 951; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1984
  • Hyman v. Trow Directory Printing & Bookbinding Co. Nov 12, 1919 No. 24 261 F. 991; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1879
  • In re Jarmulowsky Nov 12, 1919 No. 3 261 F. 779; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1841
  • In re Malkan Nov 12, 1919 No. 45 261 F. 894; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1860
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑