Potter v. Lumsden

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Potter v. Lumsden, 93 N.J. Eq. 476 (2d Cir. 1922)
8 Stock. 476; 117 A. 31; 1922 N.J. LEXIS 318
Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Buskirk, Gardner, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenohard, Williams

Potter v. Lumsden

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

*484For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert H. McCarter Potter v. John Lumsden
Status
conveyed it to Samuel Hibbler by deed dated June 23d