U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1924

In re Ackerman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided March 10, 1924

297 F. 224; 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2813

Counsel

Austin McEanahan, Merritt & Ingraham, of New York City (H. P. Coursen, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant., Bondy & Schloss, of New York City (E. E. Bondy, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Cooper v. Brown (3d Cir. 1942)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented is whether the creditor appellant, in making the sales sought to be rescinded, relied solely, or indeed mainly, upon an admittedly false financial statement made by bankrupts. In a careful and persuasive opinion the special master found that no such reliance was given by appellant. To this finding of fact the lower court agreed. The importance attached to such concurring findings is too well established to need citation.

We see no reason to disagree, and affirm the order, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.