U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1927

United States ex rel. Ginal v. Day

United States ex rel. Ginal v. Day
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided November 14, 1927
22 F.2d 1022; 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3606 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Gaspare M. Cusumano, of New York City, for appellant., Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Edward Feldman, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City., of counsel), for appellee.

United States ex rel. Ginal v. Day

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, on the authority of U. S. ex rel. David v. Tod, 289 F. 60 (C. C. A. 2); U. S. ex rel. Patton v. Tod, 297 F. 385 (C. C. A. 2); U. S. ex rel. Danikas v. Day, 20 F.(2d) 733, 736 (C. C. A. 2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.