Bing v. Bowers
Bing v. Bowers
26 F.2d 1017
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Bing v. Bowers
Opinion
Leo S. BING, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Frank K. BOWERS, Collector of United States Internal Revenue, Defendant in Error.
Leo S. BING, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Charles W. ANDERSON, Collector of United States Internal Revenue, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
M. S. & I. S. Isaacs, of New York City (John W. Davis, Lewis M. Isaacs, and Blount Ralls, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Nathan R. Margold, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for defendants in error.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judgments affirmed, upon the opinion of Mack, J., below. 22 F.(2d) 450.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.