Henrietta Mills v. Hoey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Henrietta Mills v. Hoey, 80 F.2d 1011 (2d Cir. 1936)
17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 168; 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3328; 17 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 168

Henrietta Mills v. Hoey

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded ta the District Court, with directions to enter a decree enjoining collection of the tax. An appropriate order shall be entered directing the repayment to the plaintiff of any cash, bonds, or funds which have been *1012impounded or deposited pendente lite in conformity with the order of the court below. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., v. Fontenot, 56 S.Ct. 374, 80 L.Ed. -, January 13, 1936.

Reference

Full Case Name
The HENRIETTA MILLS v. James J. HOEY, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue for the Second Collection District of New York, Appellee BEAVER MILLS v. James J. HOEY, Individually, and etc., Appellee CLYDE FABRICS, Inc. v. James J. HOEY, Individually, and etc., Appellee MARTEL MILLS CORPORATION v. James J. HOEY, Individually, and etc.
Status
Published