Wheatena Corp. v. Hoey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Wheatena Corp. v. Hoey, 80 F.2d 1022 (2d Cir. 1936)
17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 178; 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3350; 17 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 178
Wheatena Corp. v. Hoey
Opinion of the Court
Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the District Court, with directions to enter a decree enjoining collection of the tax. An appropriate order shall be entered directing the repayment to the plaintiff of any cash, bonds, or funds which have been impounded or deposited pendente lite in conformity with the order of the court below. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., v. Fontenot, 56 S.Ct. 374, 80 L.Ed. —, January 13, 1936.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The WHEATENA CORPORATION v. James J. HOEY, as Collector of Internal Revenue for the Second District of New York, and Francis W. H. Adams, as United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York
- Status
- Published