U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1937

Koechling v. Pyne

Koechling v. Pyne
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided March 1, 1937
88 F.2d 1012; 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3328 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Arthur J. Brothers and Epstein & Brothers, all of New York City, for appellant., Hardy, Stancliffe & Hardy, of New York City (William F. McDermott and George T. Barker, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Koechling v. Pyne

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed on the authority of Jennings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 294 U.S. 216, 55 S.Ct. 394, 79 L.Ed. 869, 99 A.L.R. 1248, which has overruled, though without mention, the doctrine of Schumacher v. Harriett, 52 F.(2d) 817, 82 A.L.R. 1 (C.C.A.4).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.