U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1943

United States v. Tempone

United States v. Tempone
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided June 11, 1943 · Chase, Clark, Swan
136 F.2d 538; 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3090 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Abraham Solomon, of New York City, for appellant., Mathias F. Correa, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Arthur H. Taylor, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

United States v. Tempone

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

A jury having been duly waived, the appellant was tried before the district judge and found guilty. The only contested issue was whether he had voluntarily consented to the search of his bedroom where the narcotic agents discovered the narcotics and marihuana cigarettes upon which the indictment was based. Three agents testified that he had; the appellant testified to the contrary. The trial judge accepted the testimony of the agents. Hence the appeal raises only a question of the credibility of witnesses. The record discloses nothing which would justify a reversal on such an issue. See United States v. Jankowski, 2 Cir., 28 F.2d 800, 802; Marsh v. United States, 2 Cir., 29 F.2d 172, 173, certiorari denied 279 U.S. 849, 49 S.Ct. 346, 73 L.Ed. 992; United States v. Bianco, 2 Cir., 96 F.2d 97, 98; United States v. Adelman, 2 Cir., 107 F.2d 497, 499; De Lapp v. United States, 8 Cir., 53 F.2d 627, certiorari denied 284 U.S. 684, 52 S.Ct. 200, 76 L.Ed. 577.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.