U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1944

Goumas v. K. Karras & Son

Goumas v. K. Karras & Son
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided January 26, 1944 · Clark, Frank, Swan
140 F.2d 157; 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3893; 1944 A.M.C. 60 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Goumas v. K. Karras & Son

Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

We agree with what was said in the excellent opinion of the court below as, to the lack of admiralty jurisdiction here. There is no jurisdiction in admiralty except of a maritime contract, and the contract here was not of that character.1 The same considerations apply if the libel be regarded as stating a tort claim: It is not a maritime tort.

Affirmed.

Cory Bros. & Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 51 F.2d 1010, and cases cited; The Princess, D.C., 12 F.2d 808.

As the suit relates to events which occurred after the execution of the contract, admiralty jurisdiction, in any event, would be doubtful. Westfall Larsen & Co. v. Allman-Hubble Tug Boat Co., 9 Cir., 73 F.2d 200, 204; Cory Bros. & Co. v. United States, supra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.