U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1946

Porter v. Wendee Junior, Inc.

Porter v. Wendee Junior, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided June 27, 1946
156 F.2d 62; 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2534 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Carl Schaeffer, and Nemeroff, Jelline, Danzig & Paley, all of New York City, for appellant., Joseph Forer, George Moncharsh, Deputy Adm’r, for Enforcement, Milton Klein, Director, Litigation Div., David London, Chief Appellate Branch, and Nathan Siegel, Sp. Appellate Atty., Office of Price Administration, all of Washington, D. C., and Kenneth V. Fisher, Regional Litigation Atty., Office of Price Administration, of New York City, for appellee.

Porter v. Wendee Junior, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that Revised Maximum Price Regulation 287 contains no provision fixing the maximum price of garments which do not have the proper minimum allowable cost. Acceptance of this contention concededly requires us to disagree with Bowles v. Biberman Bros., 3 Cir., 152 F.2d 700. We do not disagree with it. On the authority of that case judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.