Truncale v. Scully

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Truncale v. Scully, 182 F.2d 1021 (2d Cir. 1950)

Truncale v. Scully

Opinion

182 F.2d 1021

Stephen TRUNCALE, suing as a stockholder in the name and in
behalf of Universal Pictures Company, Inc.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William A. SCULLY and Clifford WORK, Defendants-Appellees
and Cross-Appellants.

No. 222, Docket 21622.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 6, 1950.
Decided June 23, 1950.

Millard & Greene, New York City, Milton Pollack and Richard F. Wolfson, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff-appellant.

Philips, Nizer, Benjamin & Krim, New York City, Louis Nizer, Daniel Glass and Paul Martinson, all of New York City, of counsel, for defendant William A. Scully, appellee and cross-appellant.

H. G. Pickering (of Mudge, Stern, Williams & Tucker), New York City, John Wallis and Robert E. Walsh, New York City, of counsel, for defendant Clifford Work, appellee and cross-appellant.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Affirmed on opinion of Rifkind, J. Truncale v. Blumberg, D.C., 88 F.Supp. 677, as to the judgment granted in favor of the defendants. The cross-appeal of the defendants from the order of Judge Medina granting summary judgment to the plaintiff, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 492, is dismissed as moot.

Reference

Full Case Name
Stephen Truncale, Suing as a Stockholder in the Name and in Behalf of Universal Pictures Company, Inc. v. William A. Scully and Clifford Work, and Cross-Appellants
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published