Merrimac Hat Corp. v. Crown Overall Mfg. Co.
Merrimac Hat Corp. v. Crown Overall Mfg. Co.
Opinion of the Court
Under Rule 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A., Crown, of course, did not waive lack of service by joining a motion to dismiss the complaint with its motion to quash service. As it was not served, no restraining order could be issued against it.
Since, however, Excello was served, we proceed to consider, on the merits, the denial of a restraining order as to it.
Affirmed.
. We shall not consider whether the complaint should be dismissed because Crown is an indispensable party.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- MERRIMAC HAT CORP. v. CROWN OVERALL MFG. CO.
- Status
- Published