Powers Photo Engraving Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Garrison v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1969)
- Mendelson v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 1969)
- Yagoda v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1962)
- Pachella v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1961)
- Gatto v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1953)
- Gobins v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 1952)
- Morris v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 2000)
- Teplitz v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1978)
- Weinberg Trust v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 1970)
- Ginsberg v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1965)
- Morrison Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1962)
- Smale & Robinson, Inc. v. United States (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1954)
- Gatto v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1953)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The Tax Court held the petitioner, Powers Photo Engraving Co., Inc., liable as a transferee under Section 311 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 311, for the unpaid excess profits taxes for the year 1945 of its wholly owned subsidiary, Powers Electronic and Communication Co. The transferee liability of the petitioner arose out of a transfer in 1946 of $162,-948.24 from Electronic to the petitioner, which left the subsidiary with insufficient assets to pay the amount of its tax defici *705 ency. The petitioner contended before the Tax Court that the transfer was a repayment of various loans which it had made to the subsidiary. See Weil v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 91 F.2d 944, 946. The Commissioner, on the other hand, contended that the transfer was a return of capital which the petitioner had invested in Electronic. The Tax Court found in favor of the Commissioner and its finding is not clearly erroneous but is in accord with recent decisions of this court. Dobkin v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 192 F.2d 392; Mat-thiessen v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 194 F.2d 659.
However, in computing the excess profits tax liability of the subsidiary for the year 1945, the Commissioner treated the amounts advanced by the petitioner as “borrowed” capital which of course resulted in a larger tax. The petitioner urges that this action by the Commissioner es-topped him from asserting that the transfer was not a repayment of a loan. We do not agree. However, in fairness to the petitioner, the case must be remanded to the Tax Court where the amount of the deficiency should be recomputed in the light of the Tax Court’s finding that the moneys advanced by the petitioner were investments of capital and not loans.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.