U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1954

Fischler v. McCarthy

Fischler v. McCarthy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided December 20, 1954
218 F.2d 164 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Harry Green, New York City (Samuel A. Bloom, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants., Alfred P. O’Hara, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City (Daniel G. Buckley, J. Edward Lumbard, U. S. Atty., and Thomas A. Bolan, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Fischler v. McCarthy

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The dismissal is affirmed for lack of venue in the district court. See 28 U. S.C. § 1391 (b); Butterworth v. Hill, 114 U.S. 128, 5 S.Ct. 796, 29 L.Ed. 119; and the opinion of Judge Kaufman below as reported in D.C.S.D.N.Y., 117 F. Supp. 643, at pages 646-647.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.