Charles M. Weber, Doing Business as Weber-Millican & Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Maurietta v. Ciccone (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1969)
- Merritt, Vickers, Inc., A/K/A M. J. Merritt & Co., Inc. And Matthew J. Merritt, Jr. And James S. Vickers v. Securities and Exchange Commission (2d Cir. 1965)
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Mono-Kearsarge Consolidated Mining Co. (District Court, D. Utah 1958)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The Securities and Exchange Commission, through its Division of Trading and Exchanges, charged petitioner with misconduct in transactions involving the Inland Oil Company and the Magma King Manganese Mining Co. The evidence amply supports the Commission’s conclusions that petitioner was guilty of fraudulent misstatements and of wrongful diversions of funds in connection with his underwriting of an issue of stock for Inland. And the Commission was equally justified in finding that petitioner had sold Magma King shares to the general public on his own account without adequate disclosure of the great disparity between his sales price and the current market prices. We see no reason not to adhere to our prior decision permitting the introduction of National Daily Quotation Sheets as evidence of such market prices. Charles Hughes & Co. v. S. E. C., 2 Cir., 139 F.2d 434, certiorari denied 321 U.S. 786, 64 S.Ct. 781, 88 L.Ed. 1077. The sanctions imposed by the Commission for these serious breaches of duty by the petitioner were certainly not so excessive as to constitute an abuse of administrative discretion. Wright v. S. E. C., 2 Cir., 134 F.2d 733.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.