Jack M. Chesbro, Carl Silverstein, Morris Silverstein, Smiling Jack Chesbro, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cases that cite this one
22 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dileo v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 1991)
- DiLeo v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1991)
- James D. Ballou and Sarah L. Ballou v. United States (6th Cir. 1966)
- Burke v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1995)
- Estate of Weissbart v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1992)
- Cockey v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1985)
- Ramsey v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1984)
- Rosenbaum v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1983)
- Bourque v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1980)
- Ocean Sands Holding Corp. v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1980)
- Walter v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1980)
- Cooperberg v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1979)
- White v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1978)
- Qualley v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1976)
- Board of Trade, Inc. v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1969)
- Charles E. Oates and Chaytor Oates v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (8th Cir. 1963)
- Sclafani v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 1963)
- Campbell v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1961)
- International Trading Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (7th Cir. 1960)
- John Factor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (9th Cir. 1960)
- Ingalls v. Patterson (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 1958)
- Raymond E. Nellis v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (6th Cir. 1956)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
We adopt the opinion of the Tax Court. 21 T.C. 123. We add only a few words addressed to the appellants’ contention that the Pax Court erred in failing to apply the holding of this court announced in Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d 540. The principal similarity of that case to this lies in the fact that in neither did the taxpayer have books of account to support the allowance. of claimed deductions. But in Cohan, the Tax Court was reversed only because it found that the taxpayer had made some allowable expenditures, yet gave him credit for none. That holding is not applicable here. To the extent that the Tax Court found credible evidence to support deductible expenditures, it allowed them, even in the absence of supporting books of account. The evidence offered to prove further expenditures was not such that the Tax Court was obliged to accept it, since it depended on the credibility of witnesses — largely on the credibility of the taxpayers themselves who concededly had long engaged in illegal business activities. That a witness had engaged in practices violative of federal price controls is a factor properly to be considered in judging of his credibility. Nothing in the Cohan case holds to the contrary. Here, the decision below was consistent with findings which on the evidence were well within the province of the trier.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.