McCarthy v. Pennsylvania Railroad
McCarthy v. Pennsylvania Railroad
227 F.2d 382
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
McCarthy v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Opinion of the Court
There was sufficient evidence to present an issue for the jury in support of plaintiff’s contention that the operator of the electric baggage truck might have chosen a safe path on the other side of the station platform, instead of the course he followed — next the train discharging and receiving passengers. See, e. g., Callaghan v. City of New York, 283 App.Div. 388, 128 N.Y.S.2d 206.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.