U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1956

Lehman v. Commissioner

Lehman v. Commissioner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided June 29, 1956
234 F.2d 958 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

McGuigan & KilcuIIen, New York City (Richard KilcuIIen, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner on review., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Charles Freeman, Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum and David O. Walter, Washington, D. C., Attorneys, Department of Justice, of counsel), for respondent., Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, New York City (Leslie M. Rapp and David G. Sacks, New York City, of counsel), for Robert Lehman, amicus curias.

Lehman v. Commissioner

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the Tax Court, Docket Numbers 49981, 49982 and 49983, reported at 14 T.C.M. 928, is affirmed. Robert Lehman, 17 T.C. 652.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.