U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1959

Miller v. Gillette

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided June 15, 1959

267 F.2d 783 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Minniola 0. Miller, pro se., Howard J. Maxwell, of Steele, Collins & Maxwell, Hartford, Conn., for defendants-appellees., Bernard E. Francis, West Hartford, Conn., for defendants-appellees Russell L. Gillette and Rose M. Gillette.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Foreign Exchange Trade Associates, Inc. v. Oncetur, S.A. (District Court, S.D. New York 1984)
New England Merchants National Bank v. Iran Power Generation & Transmission Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1980)
Minniola O. Miller v. Russell L. Gillette, Rose M. Gillette (2d Cir. 1959)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In Miller v. Town of Suffield, 2 Cir., 249 F.2d 16, we affirmed Judge Smith’s dismissal of plaintiff's antitrust action which we characterized as an attempt to revive certain “fantastic claims of fraud and conspiracy” rejected in earlier litigation. The Supreme Court denied certiorari, 356 U.S. 978, 78 S.Ct. 1143, 2 L.Ed.2d 1151, and then a motion for rehearing, 358 U.S. 859, 79 S.Ct. 16, 3 L.Ed.2d 93. After our affirmance Judge Smith, on motion of certain defendants, dissolved an attachment pendente lite upon their property and plaintiff has appealed. She has failed, however, to show any reason why the order was not only within the power of the district court, but also required upon the termination of her action. Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.