U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1960

Speciner v. Reynolds Metals Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided June 9, 1960

279 F.2d 337 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Clarence S. Barasch, New York City (Louis C. Fieland and Herbert Semmel, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant., Walter C. Lundgren, New York City (John P. Crilly and Lundgren, Lincoln & McDaniel, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Reed Construction Data Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2014)
LinkCo, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd. (District Court, S.D. New York 2002)
Hudson Hotels Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, and Robert Hazard (2d Cir. 1993)
I. Jonas Speciner, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Abc Steel Equipment Co., Inc. v. Reynolds Metals Company (2d Cir. 1960)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment below on Judge Dimock’s thorough analysis of the facts and his discussion of the relevant principles and authorities set forth in his opinion reported at 177 F.Supp. 291 (D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1959). An examination of the exhibits fully supports Judge Dimock’s finding that all of the features of the plaintiff’s aluminum casement window which the defendant is alleged to have appro*338priated, were readily apparent from a casual inspection of the plaintiff’s window which was available on the open market.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.