Levine v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Levine v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 283 F.2d 532 (2d Cir. 1960)

Levine v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Judge Dawson had ample discretion to dismiss plaintiff’s action when plaintiff did not appear for trial at the time previously set in pre-trial conference. F.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Joseph v. Norton Co., 2 Cir., 273 F.2d 65. Additionally the disclosures at the conference showed that plaintiff had no claim; the advertising “plan” which he volunteered to send the defendant contained nothing which was not common knowledge. Soule v. Bon Ami Co., 201 App.Div. 794,195 N. Y.S. 574, affirmed 235 N.Y. 609, 139 N.E. 754; Masline v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 95 Conn. 702, 112 A. 639.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Harry LEVINE v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO.
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published