U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1963

In re Swan-Finch Oil Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided January 16, 1963

313 F.2d 140 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Arthur D. Emil, New York, N. Y., for appellant Peter Jakobson., George C. Levin, New York, N. Y., for appellees George C. Levin and James V. Hallisey, Trustees of Swan-Finch Oil Corporation, Keta Gas and Oil Company and Swan-Finch Petro Chemical Corporation, Debtors.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In the Matter of Swan-Finch Oil Corporation, Keta Gas and Oil Company, Swan-Finch Petro Chemical Corporation, Debtors (2d Cir. 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is one of a series of proceedings in the complicated affairs of the debtors in the Chapter X bankruptcy of the debtors described in the title of this case. Under the circumstances we think a reversal of this order might render nugatory and futile further action by Judge Palmieri. See Ferguson v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 1961, 288 F.2d 665, affirming sub nom. Ferguson v. Birrell, S.D.N.Y., 1960, 190 F.Supp. 506; McDonnell v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 1961, 297 F.2d 731, affirming, S.D.N.Y., 1961, 196 F.Supp. 496; Pettit v. Doeskin Products, Inc., 2 Cir., 1959, 270 F.2d 95, rehearing denied, 270 F.2d 699, cert. denied, 362 U.S. 910, 80 S.Ct. 660, 4 L.Ed.2d 618; Saltzman v. Birrell, S.D.N.Y., 1957, 156 F.Supp. 538.

*141The appeal is from the order of November 30, 1962, appointing a receiver of the premises at 1050 Park Avenue, New York City. We affirm. See opinion below filed November 7, 1962, 213 F.Supp. 638.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.