U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1965

Zentner v. American Federation of Musicians

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided April 6, 1965

343 F.2d 758 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Godfrey P. Schmidt, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant., McGoldrick, Dannett, Horowitz & Go-lub, New York City (Emanuel Dannett, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Dohrer v. Wakeman (Wash. Ct. App. 1975)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,610 the Susquehanna Corporation v. Pan American Sulphur Company (5th Cir. 1970)
Zentner v. American Federation Of Musicians Of The United States And Canada (2d Cir. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

When the case was before Judge Wein-feld plaintiff challenged the Federation’s “work dues equivalents” as violating § 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended in 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 186, and § 101(a) (3), of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 411(a) (3). In this court the latter ground of attack was not pressed. The challenge under § 302 is baseless, for reasons well expressed in the opinion of Judge Wein-*759feld, reported at 237 F.Supp. 457, denying the application for preliminary in-junctive relief.

We affirm the order below, and since it is obvious that there is no merit in plaintiff’s claims, we direct that the court below dismiss the complaint.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.