Salzano v. Hirtz
Salzano v. Hirtz
353 F.2d 536
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Salzano v. Hirtz
Opinion of the Court
This is an ordinary, run of the mill personal injury action. The parties differ on the place and manner of the accident, and on the causal relationship and extent of appellant’s injuries. Conflicting testimony was presented to the jury; there was substantial evidence to support the result that the jury reached.
Appellant claims numerous other trial errors. His contentions are either insubstantial or incorrect.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.