Eleanore J. Evans v. United States Veterans Administration Hospital
Cases that cite this one
20 later published cases cite this decision.
- Murray v. United States Postal Service (District Court, N.D. New York 1983)
- Tyrolf v. Veterans Administration (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1979)
- National Labor Relations Board v. Nash-Finch Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1971)
- Trinidad v. United States of America (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2022)
- Samtani v. City of Laredo (District Court, S.D. Texas 2017)
- McCloskey v. Mueller (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2005)
- Mahomes-Vinson v. United States (District Court, D. Kansas 1990)
- O.M. Bailey, Jr. v. Veterans Administration, Milford Clayton, Medical Personal at V.A., Defendants (4th Cir. 1987)
- Betty Lou Allen v. Veterans Administration (9th Cir. 1984)
- Murray v. United States Postal Service (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1982)
- Osorio v. Veterans Administration (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 1981)
- Stewart v. United States (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1980)
- Ingram v. Kumar (2d Cir. 1978)
- Ingram v. Kumar (2d Cir. 1978)
- Garnet Vinson v. Richmond Police Dept., and Richmond Commonwealth Attorney, Etc. (4th Cir. 1977)
- State of Colo. v. Veterans Administration (United States District Court for the District of Colorado 1977)
- Knowles v. Worsham (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1977)
- Esp Fidelity Corporation v. Department of Housing and Urban Development (9th Cir. 1975)
- Frank P. Morano v. U.S. Naval Hospital (3d Cir. 1971)
- Groce v. Rapidair, Inc. (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 1969)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Eleanore J. Evans appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Herlands, J., which dismissed her complaint against a United States Veterans Administration Hospital. The Court below correctly determined that the Hospital was immune from suit since it is well established that a Veterans Administration Hospital, as an instrumentality of the Veterans Administration, cannot be sued in its own name. Fermin v. Veterans Administration, 312 F.2d 554 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 375 U.S. 864, 84 S.Ct. 135, 11 L.Ed.2d 91 (1963); Suess v. Pugh, 245 F.Supp. 661 (N.D.W.Va. 1965); Napier v. Veterans Administration, 187 F.Supp. 723 (D.N.J. 1960), aff’d 298 F.2d 445 (3rd Cir. 1962), cert. denied 371 U.S. 186, 83 S.Ct. 266, 9 L.Ed.2d 228 (1962). Furthermore, plaintiff is foreclosed from amending her complaint to add the United States as a party and thereafter proceeding under the Federal Tort Claims Act, since the two year period of limitations under the federal statute has already run. 28 U.S.C. Section 2401. Finally, Rule 15(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which allows a claimant to amend a complaint to add a party and still have the amendment relate back to the date of the original pleading, is inapplicable here. 1 In the instant case no notice of the pendency of the claim was given to the United States within the limitations period of the Federal Tort Claims Act. 2
Affirmed.
. Rule 15. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
* * * * *
(c) Relation Baelc of Amendments * * * An amendment changing the party against whom a claim is asserted relates back if * * * within the period provided by law for commencing the action against him, the party to be brought in by amendment (1) has received such notice of the institution of the action that he will not be prejudiced and (2) knew or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning the identity of the proper party, the action would have been brought against him.
. The original complaint filed in the District Court on June 14, 1963 was not delivered by the plaintiff to the United States Marshal for service until February 1, 1967.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.