Canfield v. Penney Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit December 11, 1968

Canfield v. Penney Company, 403 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1968)

Opinion

403 F.2d 720

Doreen E. CANFIELD, and infant, by Doris A. Canfield, her
Guardian ad Litem, and Doris A. Canfield,
Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants,
v.
J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, Inc. and Crown Juvenile Products,
Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Appellees, and
Well-Made Baby Products Co., Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 165, 169, Dockets 32545, 32562.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 5, 1968.
Decided Dec. 11, 1968.

Leonard Feldman, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees-appellants.

Joseph P. Napoli, New York City (McLaughlin, Fiscella & Biancheri, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant-appellee, J. C. Penney Co., Inc.

Arthur N. Seiff, New York City (Michels, Walton, Cullen & Mele, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant-appellee, Crown Juvenile Products, Inc.

William F. McNulty, New York City (Zweibel, Steger & Foster, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee, Well-Made Baby Products Co.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge, and FRANKEL, District Judge.1

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed.

Sitting by designation

Reference

Full Case Name: Doreen E. Canfield, and Infant, by Doris A. Canfield, Her Guardian Ad Litem, and Doris A. Canfield, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc. And Crown Juvenile Products, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Appellees, and Well-Made Baby Products Co.
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published