Canfield v. Penney Company
Canfield v. Penney Company
Opinion
403 F.2d 720
Doreen E. CANFIELD, and infant, by Doris A. Canfield, her
Guardian ad Litem, and Doris A. Canfield,
Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants,
v.
J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, Inc. and Crown Juvenile Products,
Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Appellees, and
Well-Made Baby Products Co., Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 165, 169, Dockets 32545, 32562.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 5, 1968.
Decided Dec. 11, 1968.
Leonard Feldman, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees-appellants.
Joseph P. Napoli, New York City (McLaughlin, Fiscella & Biancheri, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant-appellee, J. C. Penney Co., Inc.
Arthur N. Seiff, New York City (Michels, Walton, Cullen & Mele, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant-appellee, Crown Juvenile Products, Inc.
William F. McNulty, New York City (Zweibel, Steger & Foster, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee, Well-Made Baby Products Co.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge, and FRANKEL, District Judge.1
PER CURIAM:
The judgment is affirmed.
Sitting by designation
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.