U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1969

United States v. Bujese

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided February 3, 1969 · Hays, Moore, Zavatt

405 F.2d 888 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Phylis Skloot Bamberger, New York City (Anthony F. Marra, New York City, on the brief), for appellant., Frederick F. Greenman, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, and Michael W. Mitchell, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

James Slawek v. United States (8th Cir. 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

On June 7, 1967, this court affirmed Per Curiam a judgment convicting appellant of bank robbery in violation of 18 *889U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) and of conspiring to rob a bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. United States v. Bujese, 378 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1967). Our decision was vacated by the Supreme Court, 392 U.S. 297, 88 S.Ct. 2064, 20 L.Ed.2d 1113 (6/10/68), and remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), referring to Roberts v. Russell, 392 U.S. 293, 88 S.Ct. 1921, 20 L.Ed.2d 1100 (also 6/10/68).

Upon reconsideration we reverse the judgment of conviction and grant a new trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.