United States v. Certain Space in the Property Known as the Chimes Building, Syracuse, Onondaga County, State of New York
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- United Bonding Insurance Company, Third-Party v. Catalytic Construction Company, Third-Party (3d Cir. 1976)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CERTAIN SPACE IN the PROPERTY KNOWN AS the CHIMES BUILDING, SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 96.
Docket 34674.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued October 8, 1970.
Decided December 1, 1970.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Edmund Port, Judge.
John B. Carroll, Syracuse, N. Y. (Nottingham, Carroll, Paltz, Coughlin & Conan and Adolph H. Huttar, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief), for appellants Walter J. Sampson, Bernard Greenbaum, Abner J. Mesirow and Walter A. Bogeaus, d/b/a Southeastern Industrial Dist.
William L. Allen, Jr., Syracuse, N. Y. (Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee City Investing Co.
Dirk D. Snel, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Shiro Kashiwa, Asst. Atty. Gen., James M. Sullivan, Jr., U. S. Atty., Samuel T. Betts, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., Syracuse, N. Y., and Raymond N. Zagone, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee United States of America.
Melvin & Melvin, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief for Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States, defendant-appellee.
Before MOORE, SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Port's opinion. 320 F.Supp. 492 (1969).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.