U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1970

S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board

S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided May 5, 1970 · Moore, Smith, Weinfeld
426 F.2d 290 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Charles H. Tuttle, New York City (Breed, Abbott & Morgan, Edward J. Ross and Miriam C. Feigelson, New York City, of counsel), for appellants., Ronald R. Glancz, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C. (William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Alan S. Rosenthal, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court, holding (1) the provisions of the Renegotiation Act of 1951, as amended (50 *291U.S.C. App. § 1211 et seq.) to be applicable to excessive profits realized under a Capehart Act housing contract (42 U.S.C §§ 1594-1594k; 12 U.S.C. §§ 1748-1748h-3) and (2) such application to be constitutional, is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Mulroney, reported at 51 T.C. No. 89 (March 4, 1969).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.