U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1970

United States v. Silverman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided December 11, 1970

439 F.2d 1198 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Paul, Weiss, Goldberg, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, by Simon H. Rifkind, Edward N. Costikyan and Theodore W. Striggles, New York City, of counsel, for appellant.

Cases that cite this one

26 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

United States v. Sten Thordarson, Martin Fry, Craig Dunbar, Martin Salgado, and Charles Wise (9th Cir. 1981)
United States v. Duff (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1981)
SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp. (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 1976)
United States v. Thompson (District Court, E.D. New York 2015)
United States v. Larson (District Court, W.D. New York 2011)
United States v. Gotti (District Court, S.D. New York 2006)
United States v. Gotti (District Court, S.D. New York 2006)
In re: Dow Corning Corporation (2d Cir. 2001)
United States v. John Walsh (2d Cir. 1999)
United States v. Barbara Nolan and Nhg Pension Associates, Inc., August Mezzetta Gb Resources, Inc. And Gotham Associates, Ltd. Partnership (2d Cir. 1998)
United States v. Sainato (District Court, E.D. New York 1998)
United States v. Nick Stavroulakis (2d Cir. 1992)
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Walter J. Butler, Cross-Appellee (2d Cir. 1992)
United States v. Ellison M. Stockton (4th Cir. 1986)
State v. Bell (N.H. 1984)
United States v. Frank C. Marolda (9th Cir. 1980)
United States v. August W. Durnin (5th Cir. 1980)
United States v. Boffa (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 1980)
United States v. New Buffalo Amusement Corp., Aquarius Releasing, Inc., and Terry Levene (2d Cir. 1979)
United States of America, Appellant-Appellee v. Lani M. Brozyna, Defendant-Appellee-Appellant (2d Cir. 1978)
United States v. Michael Capanegro (2d Cir. 1978)
In re Ampicillin Antitrust Litigation (District Court, District of Columbia 1978)
United States v. Andrew Garguilo (2d Cir. 1977)
Xerox Corp. v. SCM Corp. (2d Cir. 1976)
United States v. International Business Machines Corp. (District Court, S.D. New York 1974)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s petition for a rehearing suggests that our opinion makes an exception to the attorney-client confidential communication rules. This was not the intent of the opinion. To avoid any such impression, the paragraph of the decision filed July 1, 1970, reported in 430 F.2d at page 122 and reading “The privilege as commonly formulated *1199* * * ” and continuing to the paragraph on page 122 (right-hand column) reading “In view of the position * * ” in the opinion reported at 430 F.2d 106, is deleted. However, with respect to the Friedland report, we believe that under the circumstances it was properly received in evidence.

We have considered all the other grounds advanced in the petition for rehearing, and deny the petition except as noted above.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.