U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1974

Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.

Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided April 11, 1974
493 F.2d 1352 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Cora T. Walker, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant., Joseph Zuckerman, New York City (Rosenman, Colin, Kaye,' Petschek, Freund & Emil, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Retail, Wholesale & Chain Store Food Employees Union, Local 338., Roberto Lebrón, New York City, for defendant-appellee Fedco Foods, Inc., Howard B. Weinreich, and Guggenhei-mer & Untermyer, New York City, for defendant-appellee Shopwell, Inc., Bernard J. Ferguson, Woodside, N. Y., for defendant-appellee Mid-Eastern Cooperatives, Inc., Walter Steck, and Farber, Raucher & Goldberg, New York City, for defendant-appellee Pioneer Food Stores, Inc., Stanley Bierman, and Unterberg, Ban-dler & Goldstein, New York City, for defendant-appellee Associated Food Stores, Inc., Robert Sugerman, and Berger, Kramer & Levenson, New York City, for defendant-appellee Sloan’s Supermarkets, Inc., Sol Needle, and Sirota & Kurta, New York City, for defendant-appellees Theodore Solomon, Aaron Kaufman and Harry Rosenblum.

Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Despite the unquestionable sincerity of plaintiff’s counsel, we are satisfied that Judge Pierce acted well within his discretion in denying temporary injunc-tive relief. 371 F.Supp. 701. His order is therefore affirmed. ■

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.