David Stirling, Jr., and William G. Stirling v. Chemical Bank, Individually, and as Agent
David Stirling, Jr., and William G. Stirling v. Chemical Bank, Individually, and as Agent
Opinion
David STIRLING, Jr., and William G. Stirling, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CHEMICAL BANK, Individually, and as Agent, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 1026, Docket 75-7006.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Submitted May 29, 1975.
Decided May 30, 1975.
Feldshuh, Weinberger & Derfner, New York City (Sidney Feldshuh, Donald A. Derfner, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City (Ralph L. McAfee, Richard S. Simmons, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees Chemical Bank, Frank Beatty, John J. Irish and Paavo Prima.
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, for defendant-appellee The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber, Buffalo, Bleakley, Platt, Schmidt, Hart & Fritz, New York City, for defendants-appellees Marine Midland Bank Western and Marine Midland Bank Rochester.
Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, Rochester, N. Y., Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City, for defendant-appellee Lincoln First Bank of Rochester.
Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates, New York City, for defendant-appellee Union Commerce Bank.
Before CLARK, Associate Justice,* and HAYS and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm upon Judge Bonsal's well considered opinion reported at 382 F.Supp. 1146 (S.D.N.Y. 1974).
United States Supreme Court, retired, sitting by designation
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.