U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1976

Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Podell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided December 6, 1976 · No. 504 · Friendly, Mulligan, Waterman

546 F.2d 495 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

C. MacNeil Mitchell, New York City (Breed, Abbott & Morgan, New York City, Stephen R. Lang, George F. Vary, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee., Robert R. MacDonnell, New York City (Trubin Sillcoeks Edelman & Knapp, New York City), for defendants-appellants.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Williams (District Court, D. Maryland 1985)
David M. Cummings v. United States of America and Colonel James M. Sigler (5th Cir. 1981)
Daniel H. Overmyer and Shirley Overmyer v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (2d Cir. 1977)
Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Odif Podell, and Eon Corporation and Kerns Manufacturing Corp. (2d Cir. 1976)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

On this appeal from a judgment against the defendants-appellants for money damages, we affirm on the opinion of Hon. Whitman Knapp, United States District Court Judge, Southern District of New York, reported at 401 F.Supp. 729 (S.D.N.Y. 1975).* The appellants also appeal from Judge Knapp’s order denying a new trial on the alleged ground of newly discovered evidence. The order is affirmed as we find that appeal to be totally without merit and frivolous. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U-.S.C. § 1912 and Fed.R.App.P. 38, we assess the appellants double costs and, in addition, $1,500 in attorneys’ fees.

See also Judge Bauman’s opinion on a motion for summary judgment in this case, 373 F.Supp. 191 (S.D.N.Y. 1974).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.