U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1986

Joseph Allan Wilson v. Hon. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility

Joseph Allan Wilson v. Hon. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided September 3, 1986 · Timbers, Van Graafei-Land Cardamone
800 F.2d 304; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 29742 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Ida C. Wurezinger, New York City (Philip S. Weber, New York City, of counsel), for appellant., Jeremy Gutman, Asst. Dist. Atty., New York City (Mario Merola, Dist. Atty., Steven R. Kartagener, Asst. Dist. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Joseph Allan Wilson v. Hon. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This Court in the above state prisoner habeas corpus case, on August 27, 1984 by a divided vote, 742 F.2d 741 (Van Graafei-land, J., dissenting), having reversed a judgment of the district court and having entered a judgment directing that appellant Wilson, who had been convicted in a state court of murder and robbery, be released unless the state retried him; and

The Supreme Court of the United States on June 26, 1986, on the state’s petition for a writ of certiorari, having concluded, sub nom. Kuhlmann v. Wilson, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2616, 91 L.Ed.2d 364, that this Court’s judgment of August 27, 1984 was “clear error”, — U.S. at-, 106 S.Ct. at 2629-31 and having reversed the said judgment of this Court, and having remanded the case to this Court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of Mr. Justice Powell, id; now it is

ORDERED ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows:

(1) The said judgment of this Court entered August 27, 1984, 742 F.2d 741, is in all respects vacated and set aside.
(2) The case is remanded to the district court with directions to dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the merits with prejudice.
(3) Costs in this Court on all proceedings shall be taxed in favor of appellee and against appellant Wilson.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.