U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1991

D'Agnillo v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided January 8, 1991 · Altimari, Kearse, Winter

923 F.2d 17 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

John D’Agnillo, Yonkers, N.Y., pro se., D. Bruce La Pierre, Atty., Civ. Div., Dept, of Justice (Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Otto Ober-maier, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., Michael Jay Singer, Atty., Civ. Div., Dept, of Justice, John W. Herold, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Harold J. Rennett, Atty., Dept, of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for defendant-appellee U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development., Warren J. Bennia, New York City, for defendants-appellees Fair Housing Implementation Office of the City of Yonkers and its Director, Karen Hill., Raymond P. Fitzpatrick, Birmingham, Ala. (Mason & Fitzpatrick, Birmingham, Ala., Office of the Corp. Counsel, City of Yonkers, Yonkers, N.Y., of counsel; Thomas R. DeRosa, Edward G. Bailey, Craig B. Kravit, Beveridge & Diamond, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

John D'agnillo v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban Development (2d Cir. 1991)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff pro se John D’Agnillo and defendant City of Yonkers, New York (“City”), appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles S. Haight, Jr., Judge, dismissing D’Agnillo’s complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief to compel preparation by defendant United States Department of Housing and Urban Development of certain environmental impact statements, and to delay construction by the City of housing previously ordered as a remedy for housing discrimination in Yonkers, see, e.g., United States v. Yonkers Board of Education, 624 F.Supp. 1276 (1985) and 635 F.Supp. 1577 (1986), both aff'd, 837 F.2d 1181 (2d Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1055, 108 S.Ct. 2821, 100 L.Ed.2d 922 (1988).

We affirm the judgment of the district court denying declaratory and injunctive relief substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Haight’s Memorandum Opinion and Order published at 738 F.Supp. 1454 (1990). The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.