Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1992

United States v. Alexander

United States v. Alexander
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided April 22, 1992
962 F.2d 199; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7617 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Alexander

Opinion

962 F.2d 199

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Sandy F. ALEXANDER, Collette Alexander, Kimberly Alexander,
Howard S. Weisbrod, Mary Weisbrod, Herbert Kittel,
Michelle Kittel, Charles Zito, Defendants,
Paul F. Casey, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 1255, Docket 91-1746.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued April 13, 1992.
Decided April 22, 1992.

Richard J. Appel, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Otto G. Obermaier, U.S. Atty., Daniel C. Richman, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., of counsel), for appellee.

Harriet B. Rosen, New York City, for defendant-appellant.

Before: VAN GRAAFEILAND and PRATT, Circuit Judges, and Michael B. MUKASEY, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm, substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Leval's opinion, United States v. Casey, 788 F.Supp. 725 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑