Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1994

American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone Corporation

American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided November 4, 1994
39 F.3d 411; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30987 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone Corporation

Opinion

39 F.3d 411

AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED ARTISTS PAYPHONE CORPORATION, United Artists
Telecommunications, Inc., UA/Ranlee Joint Venture
& UA/Ranlee, Inc., Defendants-Appellants,
Ranlee Communications, Inc., Defendant.

No. 762, Docket 94-7616.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 2, 1994.
Decided Nov. 4, 1994.

Robert M. Peak, New York City (Jeffrey N. Leibell, Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol, of counsel), for defendants-appellants.

Peter J. McHugh, New York City (Martin Domb, Hill, Betts & Nash, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: MESKILL, WINTER, and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Leisure. American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. United Artists Payphone Corp., 852 F.Supp. 221 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑