Lappe v. Honda Motor Co. Ltd. of Japan
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Woelfle v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. (District Court, W.D. New York 2023)
- Argonaut Insurance v. Samsung Heavy Industries Co. (District Court, N.D. New York 2013)
- Humphrey v. Diamant Boart, Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 2008)
- Santoro Ex Rel. Santoro v. Donnelly (District Court, S.D. New York 2004)
- Henry v. Champlain Enterprises, Inc. (District Court, N.D. New York 2003)
- Ulico Casualty Co. v. Clover Capital Management, Inc. (District Court, N.D. New York 2002)
- Colon Ex Rel. Molina v. Bic USA, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2001)
- Gemological Institute of America, Inc. v. Trang Thi-Dai Phan (District Court, District of Columbia 2001)
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Coric (District Court, N.D. New York 1996)
- Waitek v. Dalkon Shield Trust (District Court, N.D. Iowa 1996)
- Polizzi Meats, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. (District Court, D. New Jersey 1996)
- Family Realty & Construction Co. v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. (District Court, N.D. New York 1996)
- MacCleery v. Royce Union Bicycle (District Court, D. New Hampshire 1996)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
101 F.3d 682
NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23.
Steven LAPPE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HONDA MOTOR COMPANY LTD. OF JAPAN, Honda Research &
Development, Ltd., American Honda Motor Co. Inc., ABC Co.
and Johns Doe, names of fictitious manufacturers, designers
and/or distributors, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7389.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 11, 1996.
Appearing for Appellant:Robert A. Vort, Roseland, NJ.
Appearing for Appellees:Robert M. Goodman, Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, Newark, N.J.
N.D.N.Y.
AFFIRMED.
Before KEARSE, ALTIMARI and JACOBS, Circuit Judges.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed. All of the trial court's evidentiary rulings that are challenged on this appeal were within the court's discretion and are not manifestly erroneous. See, e.g., Fed.R.Evid. 403, 702; Phoenix Associates III v. Stone, 60 F.3d 95, 100 (2d Cir. 1995); United States v. Castillo, 924 F.2d 1227, 1231-32 (2d Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 101 (1994); Begley v. Ford Motor Co., 476 F.2d 1276, 1280 (2d Cir. 1973); Martell v. Boardwalk Enterprises, Inc., 748 F.2d 740, 747 (2d Cir. 1984). We have considered all of appellant's contentions on this appeal and have found in them no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.