Hughley v. Local 1199, Drug, Hospital & Health Care Employees Union

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Hughley v. Local 1199, Drug, Hospital & Health Care Employees Union, 231 F.3d 889 (2d Cir. 2000)
2000 WL 1676543

Hughley v. Local 1199, Drug, Hospital & Health Care Employees Union

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Defendants Claude Ferrara et al. appeal from an opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Haight, District Judge), dated March 7, 2000, which denied their motion for attorney fees and costs. On appeal, defendants argue that they are entitled to fees and costs under common benefit, promotion of union democracy and state law theories. For the reasons stated by the district court, we find that defendants are not entitled to attorney fees and costs. We hereby adopt parts II.C, III, and IV.2 of the district court’s thorough opinion and affirm for the reasons stated therein. See Doyle v. Turner, 90 F.Supp.2d 311 (S.D.N.Y. 2000).

The order of the district court is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Betty HUGHLEY, Angela Doyle, Georgianna Johnson, Frederick Gilliam, Sylvia Grant-Gutierrez, Edward Kay, Steven Kramer, Luis Matos, James Murphy, Marc Shanker and Unity and Progress-Save Our Union Committee v. LOCAL 1199, DRUG, HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES UNION, RWDSU, Claude Ferrara, Philip Kamenkowitz, Telbert King, Herb Binger, Ramon P. Malave, Jo-Ann Marshall, Barrington Moore, Karl Rath, Floris Saunders, Floyd Shepard and Doris Turner
Status
Published