McNatt v. Parker
Opinion of the Court
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.
Carlton Edward Jolley, pro se, informa pauperis, and incarcerated, appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 56(c). Specifically, Jolley appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Eighth Amendment and procedural due process claims, as well as the sufficiency of the district court’s “guidance” as to how he could cure pleading deficiencies. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Nevas’s Ruling and Order. See McNatt, et al. v. Unit Manager Parker, et al., No. 96 CV 1397(AHN), 1997 WL 251578 (D.Conn. Jan. 18, 2000).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Michael McNATT John Roy Alton Woods, Carlton Edward JOLLEY v. PARKER, Mr., I/O Rubo, Captain, I/O a Lt. Sullivan Potz, Head Sup'r, I/O, John Armstrong, Individual and Official Capacity Willis, Officer, Individual and Official Capacity Montesi, Counselor, Individual and Official Capacity John Hall, Individual and Official Capacity Miele, Deputy Warden, I/O capacity Jean Gladding, I/O capacity Deborah Vaughn, Lt., I/O capacity Eddie Desk, I/O capacity William Robert Franck, I/O capacity Riggott, C/O, I/O capacity Wayne Sparks, I/O capacity Robert Leddy
- Status
- Published