Walter Sedovic Architect, P.C.-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. John A. Alesandro-Counterclaimants-Appellees
Walter Sedovic Architect, P.C.-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. John A. Alesandro-Counterclaimants-Appellees
Opinion
Counsel for certain defendants-counter-claimants-appellees having informed this Court in or about November 2000 that the above action has been settled,
And this Court having unsuccessfully requested the parties to file a stipulation of discontinuance of the appeal, which was scheduled to be heard on January 10, 2001,
And this Court having telephoned the office of Philip Furgang, Furgang & Ad-war (“Furgang”), counsel of record for plaintiff-counterclaim-defendant-appellant (“plaintiff’), and having eventually been informed by Furgang that the matter has been settled and that written confirmation would be forthcoming from Kevin J. O’Neill, Gogic, Byrne & O’Neill (“O’Neill”), another firm representing plaintiff,
And O’Neill, having sent this Court a letter dated January 5, 2001, stating that this appeal has been rendered moot because the matter has been settled, and attaching a copy of a stipulation of dismissal filed in the district court and so-ordered by that court on December 4, 2000,
It is hereby ordered that the appeal be and it hereby is dismissed with prejudice.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- WALTER SEDOVIC ARCHITECT, P.C., Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, v. John A. ALESANDRO, Et Al., Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellees
- Status
- Published