Stevens v. Artuz
Stevens v. Artuz
Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was argued by counsel.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment and order of said District Court be and they hereby are affirmed.
Plaintiff Terrence Stevens appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dismissing his complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of his rights under the Due Process Clause and the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution, and from an order denying reconsideration of the dismissal. On appeal, he principally challenges (1) a December 1998 order, Sidney H. Stein, Judge, that (a) dismissed his claims against defendants C.
We have considered all of Stevens’s contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment and order of the district court are affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.