U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2002

United States v. Velaj

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Decided January 28, 2002

26 F. App'x 88

Counsel

Avraham C. Moskowitz, New York, NY; Joseph A. Grob, on the brief, for Appellant., Thomas J. Seigel, Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY; Alan Vinegrad, United States Attorney for the Eastern District; Susan Corkery, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

David Elledge appeals from the order of the district court for the Eastern District of New York (Amon, J.), denying Elledge’s motion for a new trial (pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 33). His Rule 33 motion alleged, inter alia, ineffective assistance of counsel, arising out of Elledge’s conviction of conspiracy to export cocaine and exportation of cocaine (in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 953(a)) and conspiracy to launder monetary instruments and laundering of monetary instruments (in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a) and 1956(a)(2)(B)).

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Amon’s Memorandum and Order. See United States v. Elledge, No. 98 CR 1060 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 24, 2001).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.